<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Political Revolution &#187; Marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com/tag/marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 20:21:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Death threats target opponents of &#8216;gay&#8217; promotion</title>
		<link>http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com/2009/04/18/death-threats-target-opponents-of-gay-promotion/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com/2009/04/18/death-threats-target-opponents-of-gay-promotion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Political Revolution</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Day of Silence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com/?p=533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least one pro-family organization that has opposed the pro-homosexual &#8220;Day of Silence&#8221; is being targeted with hate e-mails and telephone calls, including suggestions that officials go and kill themselves. &#8220;You may not be gay, but you may be next,&#8221; said one e-mail, which included a photograph of a casket, according to Karen England, executive [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com/2009/04/18/death-threats-target-opponents-of-gay-promotion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paterson Expected to Propose Gay Marriage Bill</title>
		<link>http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com/2009/04/14/paterson-expected-to-propose-gay-marriage-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com/2009/04/14/paterson-expected-to-propose-gay-marriage-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Political Revolution</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com/?p=505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York legislative officials say Gov. David Paterson is expected to introduce legislation to legalize gay marriage. Two officials say he will introduce the legislation Thursday. They spoke on condition of anonymity because there&#8217;s been no formal announcement. The proposal would revive a bill that died in 2007 and still faces strong opposition despite a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com/2009/04/14/paterson-expected-to-propose-gay-marriage-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vermont legalizes same-sex marriage</title>
		<link>http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com/2009/04/07/vermont-legalizes-same-sex-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com/2009/04/07/vermont-legalizes-same-sex-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Political Revolution</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com/?p=442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Republican governor of Vermont vetoed a bill legalizing same-sex marriage passed by the state&#8217;s Legislature yesterday, only to have the lawmakers at the Capitol override the veto today. The bill had passed easily through the Vermont Senate, 26-4, last month, but the House had approved it 95-52, just five votes short of the two-thirds [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com/2009/04/07/vermont-legalizes-same-sex-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>eHarmony blows off customer objections to &#8216;gay&#8217; site</title>
		<link>http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com/2009/04/03/eharmony-blows-off-customer-objections-to-gay-site/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com/2009/04/03/eharmony-blows-off-customer-objections-to-gay-site/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Political Revolution</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eharmony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com/?p=411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The launch by dating service eHarmony.com of a new website for homosexuals is creating concern among customers who were attracted to the company because of its Christian foundations, but they&#8217;re not getting any satisfaction. WND reported when eHarmony launched its new Compatible Partners website for homosexuals, the result of a settlement of a discrimination complaint [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com/2009/04/03/eharmony-blows-off-customer-objections-to-gay-site/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iowa high court legalizes gay marriage in state</title>
		<link>http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com/2009/04/03/iowa-high-court-legalizes-gay-marriage-in-state/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com/2009/04/03/iowa-high-court-legalizes-gay-marriage-in-state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Political Revolution</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com/?p=409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DES MOINES, Iowa – Iowa&#8217;s Supreme Court legalized gay marriage Friday in a unanimous and emphatic decision that makes Iowa the third state — and the first in the nation&#8217;s heartland — to allow same-sex couples to wed. In its decision, the high court upheld a lower court&#8217;s ruling that found a state law restricting [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com/2009/04/03/iowa-high-court-legalizes-gay-marriage-in-state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Webster&#8217;s dictionary redefines &#8216;marriage&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com/2009/03/19/websters-dictionary-redefines-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com/2009/03/19/websters-dictionary-redefines-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Political Revolution</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merriam-Webster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com/?p=185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the nation&#8217;s most prominent dictionary companies has resolved the argument over whether the term &#8220;marriage&#8221; should apply to same-sex duos or be reserved for the institution that has held families together for millennia: by simplt writing a new definition. &#8220;I was shocked to see that Merriam-Webster changed their definition of the word &#8216;marriage,&#8217; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicalrevolution.putblog.com/2009/03/19/websters-dictionary-redefines-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
